Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Yom HaShoah Sermon

What follows is the sermon I delivered when we observed Yom HaShoah on April 29th.

Our sacred task in the face of the Holocaust is the pursuit of memory.

I have been thinking about the question of justice.  This year is the 50th anniversary of the Eichmann trial and I have been reading Deborah Lipstadt’s The Eichmann Trial.  I urge you to read this book and to watch some of the video clips posted on this blog.  Perhaps you might even want reread the controversial Eichmann in Jerusalem by Hannah Arendt.    

Here is my question for this evening.  Is justice possible?  I believe justice is about rebalancing the scales.  It is about two things: 1. punishment and 2. restitution.  With regard to both of these categories it is impossible to rebalance the scales—in the face of the Holocaust.  Perhaps it is possible with regard to punishment for our tormentors.

This is why Israel’s punishment of Eichmann was so appropriate.  There is only one capital crime in the modern State of Israel.  It is the crime of genocide.  Eichmann was hanged and his body cremated.  The ashes were scattered in the Mediterranean Sea beyond Israel’s territorial waters.  In the Jewish imagination there is no worse punishment than to have your name blotted out.  And so his name appears on no gravestone!  

In terms of the second category of restitution it is impossible.  How can there be recompense for the suffering of six million victims?  So many millions can not even be represented?  How can such suffering be rebalanced?  How can there ever be adequate payment for such extraordinary suffering?

This does not mean we should give up our pursuit of the tormentors or their accomplices or the companies and leaders that enabled them.  But these pursuits are more about remembering and telling the story than the pursuit of justice.  This is because the pursuit of justice in the face of the enormity of the Holocaust is especially inadequate and imperfect.  So our pursuit must be more about the pursuit of memory.

I believe remembering can serve to inspire.  It must serve to inspire us to better our world.  We must therefore speak out against suffering—wherever and whenever it might occur.  One of the most powerful exhibits at the Glen Cove Holocaust Museum is the final pictures.  One picture is the most powerful of all.  It tells the story of a friendship between an elderly Holocaust survivor and a young woman who survived the Rwanda genocide.  A Jewish man from Europe and a black woman from Africa together speak out against genocide and hatred.

This is also the power of our Torah portion’s words.  “Lo taamod al dam re’echa.  Do not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor.”  There is a famous midrash about the first murder, that of Cain killing Abel.  The Torah states: “kol dmay achicha tzoakim elai.  The voice of your brother’s bloods screams out to Me.”  Why is blood in the plural, the rabbis ask.  It is because murder is not just about the murder of an individual but the destruction of all their potential descendants. 

I imagine this is what Israel’s attorney general had in mind when he opened the prosecution of Eichmann fifty years ago.  He said, “Damam tzoek.  Their blood cries out, but their voice is not heard.”

Each of us has a duty to save another human being in distress.  We cannot say as Cain did, “Am I my brother’s keeper?”  This of course is what Eichmann also failed to understand.  His notion of morality was to follow orders whatever they might be.  Our belief by contrast is that each of us has a responsibility to other human beings.  We are responsible for others!  Wherever and whenever another cries out we must not be silent.  We must rise up to help them.

That is what the memory of the Holocaust must inspire us to do.  And that is what we must pursue each and every day of our lives.  We pursue memory so that we might better our world and alleviate suffering!
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Bin Laden is Dead

This week's news was extraordinary, although surprising.  Nearly ten years after 9-11 the principal architect of these terrorist attacks was killed.  There should be no moral qualms about our efforts to hunt him down and finally kill him.  Punishment is served.  Deterrence, we hope and pray, is also achieved.  That his punishment is just does not mean as politicians and pundits now pronounce that justice is also served.  There can really be no justice in the face of the deaths of thousands.  I doubt very much if the families of those murdered feel any more sense of closure now that this architect of death and destruction is no more.  To my mind justice is also about re-balancing the scales.  How can this be achieved when so many have been murdered, so many still suffering and countless more terrorized?  For that matter, how can there ever be such an accounting when even one life is taken?

This as well does not mean that we rejoice over his death.  We belong to a tradition that teaches that we never celebrate death, even that of our self-proclaimed enemies.  The Talmud declares: If someone comes to kill you, get up earlier to kill him first.  Had we followed this dictum and killed bin Laden 12 years ago, or immediately following the bombing of the USS Cole, now that would have been cause for rejoicing.  We would not then be celebrating his death but the saving of so many lives.  Our cause would have been equally just at that time, but far more difficult to explain to the American public.  We would not even have known then what were celebrating.  Those were innocent, and naive, years.  I also celebrate the decision to send commandos to carry out this mission rather than bombing from the air.  I recognize that the decision may have had more to do with the desire to prove bin Laden's death than the preservation of civilian lives.  Nonetheless I rejoice that civilians were not killed during this justified raid.  Such things are what we celebrate.  I do not dance when another human being is killed.  Even a just punishment is never reason to celebrate.

Today nearly all recognize that bin Laden needed to be killed and his ideology needs to be eradicated.  All that is, except for the likes of Hamas.  Ismail Haniyeh, prime minister of Hamas ruled Gaza, said: "We condemn the assassination and the killing of an Arab holy warrior. We regard this as a continuation of the American policy based on oppression and the shedding of Muslim and Arab blood."  Reason appears to fail such leaders.  Even though bin Laden was responsible for murdering Muslims as well, it is wrong when a non-Muslim kills a Muslim.  Apparently it is only right when Muslims kill non-Muslims.  Such appears to be his view.  It is a contorted morality.  It is twisted reason.  And this is the leader with whom Mahmoud Abbas and Fatah have signed an accord.  Such actions indicate that the West Bank's leadership prefers Palestinian unity over all else--even the possibility peace with the State of Israel, even the establishment of a Palestinian State.  This accord makes such achievements far less likely. 

It is eerie as well that only a few days after writing about Eichmann's trial and punishment I am now discussing the death of another who professed a similar malignant ideology.  Like Eichmann bin Laden was buried at sea.  There is now no place to pilgrimage.  No country can claim his memory.  It is remarkable that the US made sure that Muslim rites were provided.  Even our enemies are guaranteed religious freedom.  That more than anything else illustrates the difference between us and "them."  We celebrate our differences.  We give honor to our differences.  Bin Laden wanted to eradicate differences.  He and those who subscribe to such ideologies of hate offer a stark choice. Believe and practice like me or be killed.

I am going to celebrate that even our enemy was granted the rituals important to him.  I am certain that he would not have done likewise.  I will rejoice that here in this great country differences are celebrated and not reviled.  I seek not to erase such differences.  I revel in them.  In my view the only infidels are those who scream at all but themselves, "Infidel!"
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Yom Haatzmaut

These past weeks I have been reflecting on the unfortunate linkage of the Holocaust and the State of Israel.  Let me explain.  Many people argue, or imply, that Israel represents recompense for the suffering the Jewish people endured during the Shoah.  The State of Israel implied this when it rightfully tried and executed Adolf Eichmann fifty years ago.  (By the way this week’s burial at sea of Osama bin Laden was eerily similar to Eichmann’s.)  

President Obama also gave voice to this linkage when he said, two years ago in Cairo: “America's strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.”  Our enemies as well recognize the importance our minds ascribe to this connection.  This is partly why Iran and Hamas exert so much effort in denying the Holocaust.  They believe to deny this murder of six million Jews is to undermine the legitimacy of the modern State of Israel.

It is of course undeniable that had the State of Israel existed 78 years ago the suffering of Europe’s Jews would have been significantly ameliorated.  The Holocaust might even have been prevented.  Certainly there would have been a state that would have stood up and defended our people!  Most certainly there would have been a country that would have welcomed those of our people fleeing persecution!  Far less would have been murdered.  Fewer people would have suffered.

Yet the State of Israel is not about justice for the Holocaust.  Those scales can never be righted.  Israel is instead about an end to Jewish homelessness.  It is about our return home.  Now we no longer wander.  Now we always have a home. 

One might find this strange for an American Jew to say this.  How can I affirm a home where I do not (yet) live?  An analogy.  I live in a community where many people are privileged enough to own two homes.  Do they love one less than the other?  Likewise we are privileged to live at an unprecedented time when there is a sovereign Jewish state.  All Jews are today blessed to own two homes.  And so I believe that there is room enough in our hearts for more than one home.  Why must a choice be implied: Israel or America?  Why can’t we love two homes?

Yet we are so afraid of loving Israel as our home and claiming it as the Jewish homeland that we paint it as the answer to our people’s suffering in the Holocaust.  We justify its existence by speaking about past injustices and tragic persecutions.  We raise money and support for Israel by speaking of the continued threats Israel faces and the suffering it continues to endure.  These threats and suffering are of course very real.  But they must not become justification for the State of Israel.  Why do our hearts only pour out love in the face of a parade of victims rather than the beauty of what is indeed our home?    

So say this instead about the Jewish state.  Proclaim this about Medinat Yisrael: I have two homes.  One in which I spend most of my days.  The other I visit as often as possible.  Both I love with all my heart and soul.

That should be all the reason you need to celebrate Israel’s 63 years!
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Emor

People long for decisive leadership.  President Obama is for example often criticized for being overly professorial, consulting with too many advisors, and weighing options for days or even weeks.  Often the press reports that the American people long for quick, for a leader who will stand up and offer us a single, unwavering direction.

Yet even the greatest of leaders, Moses, is lacking in decisiveness and occasionally turns to others.  In four instances Moses appears baffled by questions or situations and in fact asks his most trusted friend, God, for guidance.  Interestingly three of these four instances deal with death.  One deals with the question of ritual impurity brought about by contacting a corpse.  Two deal with questions of capital crimes and the final example regards laws of inheritance.  Here are those examples.

In Numbers 27 Zelophehad dies and leaves no male heirs.  His daughters approach Moses and ask that the family inheritance therefore go to them.  They argue that they should be allowed to inherit their father’s land.  Moses asks God for advice.  God responds: “The plea of Zelophehad’s daughters is just…”

In Numbers 9 some men were thought to be impure because they had come into contact with a corpse.  They therefore could not offer the Passover sacrifice.  Moses is unsure how to rule and says, “Stand by, and let me hear what instructions the Lord gives about you.”  God offers a compromise.  They can offer the Passover sacrifice but must wait a month.  They can celebrate Passover during the following month.

And in Numbers 15 and in this week’s portion, in Leviticus 24, questions regarding capital crimes are addressed.  In Numbers a man collects wood on the Sabbath day.  Is this a violation of the laws of Shabbat?  He is placed into custody.  Moses is unsure how to rule.  In Leviticus a man curses God.  He is also placed into custody.  What is his punishment?  Moses again inquires of God.  In both instances God rules harshly.  These are capital crimes punishable by stoning.   

Despite the troubling punishment for these apparent small crimes, I wish to draw contemporary lessons from these examples.  Here are the values I read from these stories.  It is especially good to pause and be deliberative when dealing with questions of capital crimes.  In these final examples it is not a lack of decisiveness but instead a deliberateness that Moses exhibits.  With regard to the taking of a human life, even when justified, and even when an enemy, we must be purposeful and deliberative.  Quick and decisive might be emotionally satisfying but they are not ethically justified.

And thus the tracking and killing of Osama bin Laden appears to live up to Moses’ example and the best in American values.  Yet I do not agree with our politicians and commentators that justice has been served.  A justified punishment has been rendered but justice for the victims and their families, or for that matter our country, can never be fully realized.  Perhaps we have gained a measure of deterrence.  A rebalancing of the scales however can never be achieved.

With regard to our leaders, no person is wholly righteous.  No president is perfect.  Still I desire a president who has trouble sleeping when he sends men into harm’s way.  I desire a leader who is thoughtful and deliberative.  Making a judgment of capital punishment must never be determined lightly.  It can only be made after consultation and deliberation. 

This is the lesson we glean from our Torah portion and Moses’ example.  We may have yearned for quick and decisive punishment, but after ten years we are instead left with slow and careful.  Furthermore, it will take even more slow, careful, and especially thoughtful work and many more years to rid the world of bin Laden’s memory and the ideology he represents. 

When speaking of our enemies and those responsible for great evils, Jewish tradition assigns the inscription, yimach shmo v’zichro—may his name and memory be blotted out.  And such is my wish this week.  May the memory of bin Laden be washed away by the ocean’s waves.  May the ideology he fostered be forever blotted out from our country’s shores—and every nation’s borders.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Funeral Blues

The following article was also published in the anthology, Winter Harvest: Jewish Writing in St Louis, 2006-2011.

Even though I have served as a rabbi for over eighteen years, some of the most important and lasting lessons were learned in my earliest years prior to earning the title of rabbi.  Many times our first experiences teach us far more than we can then admit.  I still remember my grandfather teaching me how to ride a bike, his loving hand guiding me and his shouts of joy encouraging me. 

There in my mind is a tableau of first memories.  And so I continue to be drawn to the memory of officiating at my first funeral.

In 1987-88 I served as a student rabbi in Clarksdale, Mississippi, the birthplace of the Blues.  Since the 1870’s Jews had found a niche in this community and there thrived in many businesses.  Once a month I flew from Cincinnati where I was attending rabbinical school to Memphis and then rented a car, driving through the cotton fields of Northern Mississippi to Clarksdale.  There I served Congregation Beth Israel, a synagogue built in the 1930’s. 

By the 1970’s its membership was declining.   The synagogue could no longer afford a full time rabbi and so it became a training ground for young student rabbis, until ultimately closing its doors in 2003.  It was there, in Clarksdale, at the age of 23, in the first days of June 1988 that I officiated at my first funeral. 

Harry Lipson Jr. died after a long battle with cancer.  I carved out a few hours to visit with him and his wife Dottie during the course of my weekend trips.  At the funeral I recited the words from the perfect, unused pages of my new Rabbi’s Manual.  “Death has taken our beloved Harry.  Our friends grieve in their darkened world…”  Some of the words felt empty, and some even cruel.  “For when we die we carry nothing away; our glory does not accompany us.”  Others felt comforting.  On some words I stumbled.  On others I discovered strength. 

I have never before revealed this but the next day I returned to the cemetery and sat by myself at Harry’s grave.  The warm, humid Mississippi air was heavy with moisture.  I asked Harry to forgive me for being the first funeral at which I officiated.  I begged him to ignore my mistakes.  I apologized over and over again for all of my weaknesses and flaws.   I was overwhelmed by feelings of inadequacy and incompetence in facing death. 

And then I remembered that death is not a failure.  I recalled that I became a rabbi rather than a physician because I wanted to have a manual that worked for moments just as these.  I did not want to say, “There was nothing more we could do…”  but instead, “I am sorry.  I promise I will walk this path with you.  We will face this death together.  This is what our tradition says we must now do.” 

The pages of my Rabbi’s Manual are now torn and wrinkled from snow and rain.  The pages bear scribbling and notes as well as reminders that I no longer require.  There are a few pages wrinkled from my own tears, from funerals still too painful to recount.  Many have stood expectantly, looking up at me as I read from this small, holy book.  There were days when I did not know how I might summon the strength to greet these expectations.  Nearly every time I am drawn to remember Harry.      

I recall that there is no perfect path through the valley of the shadow of death.  I remember Dottie’s observation that the very words from our tradition that I found harsh and cruel she found soothing and comforting.  She explained to me that it was the comfort of a familiar voice reciting what generations of Jews have spoken for thousands of years.   I worried too much about the meaning of each word.  She listened instead to the voice.  I learned then that there is our tradition’s manual and its guidance.  There is the strength we draw from our community, from each other.

I still find it remarkable that people ask me to stand by their side at countless occasions such as these.  I am thankful that there have been far more simchas than tragedies in these eighteen years.  In these years I have studied Torah with over 200 b’nai mitzvah students and watched as their parents welcomed them into the age of Jewish responsibility.  I relish the smiles of parents and their tears of joy.  I find it to be an unparalleled privilege that my congregants want me standing there at the absolute best of times and the worst.  I am grateful that they see fit to call me rabbi.

I cannot promise that I will always say every word perfectly.  I can promise that I will continue to call it a privilege and blessing to serve as a rabbi.

And as I learned as well in the birthplace of the Blues, from the master B.B. King: “You better not look down if you want to keep on flyin’.  Put the hammer down.  Keep it full speed ahead.”
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Modern Rendition of Psalm 150

My modern rendition of Psalm 150 was recently published in Winter Harvest: Jewish Writing in St. Louis, 2006-2011.  Other articles appeared in prior anthologies.


Here is the psalm.

Praise God
Praise God in the sanctuary and
            In the vastness of nature
Praise God for goodness and compassion
For blessings and wonders
Praise God with piano and song
            With guitar and cello
            With sax and drums
            With clarinet and violin
Praise God with an orchestra of sounds
            And a symphony of music
Let every soul praise God
Let every breath sing praises to the Lord.

The anthology will soon be available on Amazon.com.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Tornadoes

The following is a beautiful and moving article about the recent, devastating tornadoes by a colleague, Rabbi Jonathan Miller, of Birmingham's Temple Emanu-El

First, I want to thank everybody for your prayers and those who reached out to me and my community in Alabama.  Caring means so much, and when we are hurting, just to be cared for is all that we need for now.

These days after the storm are kind of surreal.  Those of us who are alright are living in an eerie kind of silence.  There is really nothing that we, the non-first responders can do.  So we sit around and live our lives as normally as possible.  It is a strange kind of silence.  Still today, some of the people who are in need are still not being heard from.  There is no power or telephones or ways to communicate.  So it is strangely silent.

I went to the dentist early this morning.  The receptionist lives in a mobile home that was on the path of the tornadoes.  Her home survived the storm.  Five lots away, homes are destroyed.  She comes home to her home, without power, and she sees the destruction her neighbors endured on the same street.  She doesn’t know where the neighbors are either.  My dental hygienist has a niece on the Tuscaloosa Police force who was sent to Holt, a neighboring community.  She walked the streets there and found dead children in the debris.  All she could do was cover them up.  One by one, the coroner has to identify the bodies.  The fatalities are not yet counted.  All you can do is cry.

It is odd.  My wife’s yoga teacher cancelled class yesterday.  Her parent’s house in the country was destroyed, and she was asking her yoga students if anybody knows anybody with a chain saw to cut up some trees so they can get out?  Yoga ladies with chain saws, go figure.

My cleaning lady came this morning.  “I am fine, but my church members have lost so much.  The Lord was good to me.”  And then what do you say?

The Maronite church in town has a local food festival.  I try to go to all the food festivals, and they come to ours when we have them.  Since the storms, the weather has been absolutely picture perfect.  I asked a friend how she was doing?  “Fine.”  “And your family?”  “Oh, my father lives in Pleasant Grove.  He lost his house.  Only the foundation is standing.”  “What can I do for you?”  “Nothing, they won’t let us into the neighborhood yet.”  And we go get our food and ate together and nobody talked about it.  What can you say?  Here is a family that lost everything they owned, and we are eating our baklava.  There is nothing they can do and nothing we can do, yet.

Yesterday, talk radio left behind Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck to hear from local people calling in to tell their stories.  Parents were killed covering their children.  Pets are gone, and so are entire blocks of homes.  The stories were heartbreaking and numbing at the same time.  I had to turn the radio off.  How long can you listen and bear witness to this pain?  I came to Temple Emanu-El this morning (actually I slept here last night after my generator conked out—not the end of the world), and a Temple member whose family lives in Tuscaloosa told me that the people in the shelters need tote bags.  They go to the distribution centers for water and food and light clothing, but they have nothing to put them in.  So we are collecting tote bags.  Who would have thought?

We are beginning to plan a local interfaith service for to commemorate the dead, offer thanksgiving for being alive, and to build for the future.  We will do it next Wednesday, a week after the tornadoes hit.  Tomorrow morning we will do birchat hagomel.   And that is what we are doing.  And we are living in silence.  It is eerie and strange and sad.  Someday, we will all break down.  But for now, there is nothing else on our minds, and we don’t talk about it much.  What can you say?

My people in Alabama need God today.  They need God to get them through this devastation.  They need God to give them meaning when they suffer.  They need God to help them get through one lousy day after the next.  They need God to keep them sober and focused and good and generous.  They need God for all that stuff that makes life so damned difficult to get through.  I can talk to them about all the different God options that we have studied and discussed, and you know what they will say to me, “Rabbi, pray with me, pray for me, speak to God, let God know.”

For those of us who deal with people and not with eternal truths, we stop and pray.  We beseech.  We implore.  We turn to Avinu and Malkeynu.

We are blessed to have a generator at home to power the lights and refrigerator and TV.  Last night, I watched groups of people standing outside the ruins of their homes offering prayers of gratitude for being alive.  They proclaimed for the Channel Six and Channel 13 viewers that God is good and that life is good and that God is with them.  And I was very moved.  I was moved in ways that Rambam and Spinoza will never move me, not ever.

I don’t have it all figured out.  Not by a long shot.  But when the rubber hits the road, friends, lesser people like me and the people in my pews need a message of comfort and purpose and meaning.  And that is what I aim to give them.

I sent an email to my congregation this morning.  I asked them to do lots of things to help our community.  I invited them to a special service for Saturday morning.  I ended it with a religious message:
Finally, on a personal note.  As your rabbi, I cannot promise you that prayer will keep tornados away.  But I can promise you that prayer will help you endure the uncertainty with the knowledge that no one is alone, not now and not ever.  That people suffer in life is a given.  This seems to be our turn.  That our lives are filled with the prayers of others and with a caring God; this is an axiom of faith that gives us meaning and comfort.  Though we walk through the valley of the shadow of death, God is with us.  And we are with each other.
On the morning after, I think they needed to hear this.  And on the morning after, I think I needed to say this.
Pray for us and for the people who are suffering more than anybody should
ever have to suffer.

The Birmingham Jewish Federation has initiated a Tornado Recovery Fund to allow donors to participate in the rebuilding effort. Checks may be sent to:  The Birmingham Jewish Federation, PO 130219, Birmingham, AL, 35213. Please mark them for “Tornado Recovery.” In addition, contributions can be made by going to this link. Please indicate in the comments section that your contribution is for Tornado Recovery.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Yom Haatzmaut Article

What follows is an article about the upcoming holiday of Yom Haatzmaut that was recently published in The Orchard, a publication of the Jewish Federations of North America Rabbinic Cabinet.  Follow this link to download the Spring 2011 edition.  My article appears on page 19.

Why is tragedy compelling? Why is fear motivating? Why is mourning viewed as a greater obligation than celebrating? Why are more people familiar with the details of the Holocaust than the history of Zionism and Israel? These are the questions that occupy my thoughts as we approach Yom Haatzmaut, Israel Independence Day, and the celebration of 63 years of Jewish sovereignty.

To garner our support for the State of Israel we are inundated with images of Hezbollah missiles, Iran’s potential nuclear weapons, suicide bombings, divestment campaigns and in the estimation of many, dwindling support from the Obama administration. These are great worries to be sure. Israel does indeed face numerous threats. Some very real and some imagined. But my question on this Yom Haatzmaut is not about the dangers Israel faces, but instead about our personal connection to the Jewish state.

Why do we rally in far greater numbers when Israel is threatened rather than dance for joy each and every day that Israel continues to thrive? We live in an unparalleled generation of Jews. In our own day we find ourselves in a vibrant and successful diaspora community alongside a successful and vibrant Jewish state. Never before have these two co-existed. Either there was a thriving diaspora community as in Babylonia in the fifth century or a successful Jewish community in Israel as when King David ruled three thousand years ago. And so we lack historic parallels. How do we live and thrive side by side?

Of course we rise up when Israel needs us. Each of us knows how to stand by friends when they are in mourning, or experiencing tzuris. But why don’t we feel just as a great an obligation to celebrate? We should stand by Israel and sing and dance—each and every day. For two thousand years a Jewish state was only a dream. We live in a time when the dream is a reality. In a mere twelve hours (ok that is only the plane flight) you could be in Israel touching the very stones generations of Jews only dreamed of touching.

In Jerusalem in particular the air is thick with prayers. At first one thinks it is thick with the prayers of the thousands and thousands and thousands of ultra-Orthodox Jews running to pray. That is one’s first impression. It is true that a lot of people do a lot of praying in Jerusalem. I think it is instead that the air is thick with the prayers of generations. My great grandparents prayed that one day their people would return to the land of their ancestors. A hundred years later their great grandson visits there regularly. What a privilege it is to live in our generation!

In our own day our prayers have become reality. When we celebrate Yom Haatzmaut I plan to sing (and maybe even dance—watch out party enhancers!). On this day especially I don’t want my support for Israel to be motivated by fear, or tragedy. I want it only to be out how fortunate we are to live during these times. How blessed is our generation that we live alongside a vibrant and thriving State of Israel!
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Yad VaShem Testimonies

In observance of Yom HaShoah read the testimonies of this year's Torchlighters.  Every year Yad VaShem chooses six survivors to light the commemorative torches.  I would also suggest that you watch the below video. I keep coming back to this testimony, but I cannot escape its closing words: "Shalom yeladim."   "....We never saw them again."



You can watch other video testimonies here. As Elie Wiesel said: "For whoever listens to a witness becomes a witness."
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Yom HaShoah

This evening we will add special prayers and songs to our Shabbat Services in order to commemorate the Holocaust.  Yom HaShoah v’HaGevurah (Holocaust Martyrs and Heroes Remembrance Day) is officially observed on Sunday.  It is a day filled with special services, concerts and public ceremonies.  But no commemoration can adequately mark this tragedy.  Still it was not always the case that such services marked our calendar.

Fifty years ago Israeli agents captured Adolf Eichmann in Argentina and secreted him to the state for trial.  David Ben Gurion made the startling announcement to the Knesset and the world at large.  To mark this anniversary and prepare for our Yom HaShoah observances I began reading Deborah Lipstadt’s new book, The Eichmann Trial as well as rereading Hannah Arendt’s controversial, Eichmann in Jerusalem.  Arendt provocatively claimed that evil appeared so ordinary and banal in Eichmann’s visage.  Lipstadt expertly recreates the details of the trial in her gripping account.  So many years later we still fail to recognize the significance of Eichmann’s trial and the historic shift it represented.  It was pivotal in our understanding of the Holocaust and our formulation of modern Jewish identity.  It was the day that survivors’ stories began to be told—and heard. 

In 1961 Holocaust museums did not dot the landscape of American cities.  Yad VaShem was only established in 1953 and Yom HaShoah declared that same year.  The Eichmann trial brought the Holocaust to the world’s attention.   The Nuremberg trials that immediately followed the end of World War II did not do the same.  With the Eichmann trial the recent victims, now embodied in a fledgling state, tried their former tormentor.  With this trial the memory of the Holocaust was forever tied to the State of Israel.

The prosecution paraded 100 Holocaust survivors before the judges in order to add human faces to the millions of victims and the crimes of the accused.  Eichmann was one of the principal architects of the Nazi’s final solution.  One of the most famous of these survivors was Abba Kovner, Israeli poet and leader of the Vilna ghetto’s resistance.   While the intention of showcasing the testimony of survivors was noble and most certainly served to humanize the innumerable faceless victims, its long term effect may prove undermining to our future survival.  The parade of survivors suggested that the modern State of Israel represents justice for the Holocaust.

We have been living with this unfortunate linkage ever since.  We must stop perpetuating this myth.  The modern Jewish state is not recompense for the suffering our people endured in the Holocaust.  Israel is not about justice for the Holocaust.  It is about an end to Jewish homelessness.  It is about our return home.  By contrast there can never be justice for the Holocaust. 

Yes we must pursue Nazis and their sympathizers until they are no more.  We must redouble our efforts to recover lost Jewish property.   And we must always remember the Holocaust, but not as justification for the State of Israel.  Instead we must remember so that we may forever prevent another holocaust.  When others suffer we must speak out.  We must bring the likes of Eichmann to trial not so much in the pursuit of justice but instead in the service of memory.  Remembering can be ennobling and humanizing.  Punishment for our tormentors: yes.  Justice for the millions of victims: impossible.  I believe there can never be justice for the six million.  There can only be remembrance.

I have great faith in Israel’s judicial system.  (I also witnessed its court overturn a guilty verdict against John Demjanjuk when it could not prove that he was in fact Treblinka’s Ivan the Terrible.)   I believe Israel was right to capture and try Eichmann.  It was the only place where Eichmann could be tried.  Nonetheless the modern State of Israel must never be seen as justice for our suffering.  There can never be adequate payment or recompense for suffering.   Eichmann was found guilty, hanged and his ashes scattered in the Mediterranean Sea, beyond Israel’s territorial waters, thus denying a grave for his followers to pilgrimage and a country to claim his memory.  May his memory be erased by the ocean’s waves. 

Abba Kovner wrote of his sister who was murdered during the Holocaust:
My sister, in her bridal veil, sits at the table
alone.  From the shelter of the mourners
the voice of the bridegroom draws near.
without you we shall set the table
the ketubah will be written in stone.

May the memories of our murdered millions serve as a blessing, calling us to bring healing to our broken world.  May Israel forever remain our home.

Addendum: If you would like to watch attorney general Gideon Hausner’s opening statements at the 1961 Jerusalem trial of Adolf Eichmann, as well as some testimony by survivors, you may do so on YouTube:


Hausner proclaimed: “In this place, where I stand before you, judges of Israel, to serve as the prosecutor of Adolf Eichmann, I do not stand alone.  With me, here, at this very moment, stand six million prosecutors.”  I would also suggest that you visit Yad VaShem’s extraordinary website.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Kedoshim

This week’s Torah portion is brimming with ethical commandments, the most familiar of which is, “Love your neighbor as yourself.”  (Leviticus 19:18)  When the Torah scroll is unrolled to the middle this verse stands at its center.  Many have therefore interpreted this phrase to stand at the core of Jewish ethics. 

I have always found this verse perplexing.  Who is my neighbor?  What does it mean to love?  A prior verse offers needed wisdom and clarification.  Rendered literally it reads: “Do not stand on the blood of your neighbor.”  (Leviticus 19:16)  Most translators interpret the verse as follows: “Do not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor.”

Jewish tradition has understood this phrase to mean that each of us has an obligation to help others.  When someone is in distress we must try to help.  If a person is drowning we must try to rescue him or her, whether the person is young or old, man or woman, Jew or gentile, stranger or friend.  Failing to even try to save another human being in distress is likened to shedding blood. 

How often have we driven around an accident when we are rushed saying to ourselves, “I am sure the police were already called.”  Even though 911 is an easy phone call how many times do we assume someone else has made the call?  Yet we have a Jewish obligation to help others.  We need not jump in the water if we can’t swim, but we must help.  In our age it as simple as making a phone call.  Fulfilling this command is but two buttons on our cell phones.

Failure to help others transgresses Judaism’s most precious obligation to the world.  We are responsible for others.  I may have trouble understanding how I can love all people.  I have little difficulty understanding the idea that when I see another human being in trouble I am obligated to try to help.  This is what it means to be a Jew.  This is what it means to be a human being. 

This is part of what we remember as we mark the Holocaust this week.  Countless people, and far too many countries, turned their backs on the Jewish people.  At the Evian Conference when 32 nations, including the United States, met prior to Kristallnacht, in order to decide what to with Jewish refugees who wished to flee Nazi Germany, only the tiny country of the Dominican Republic offered to accept Jewish immigrants.  Later the passenger ship, St Louis, filled with German Jews, was turned away from our own country’s shores. 

Because so many turned a blind eye, the Nazis were empowered to murder six million Jews.  It was not just the Nazi regime’s murderous actions that led to the Holocaust. It was as well the world’s silence.  It was this deafening silence of the masses of humanity that allowed the evil few to perpetrate their crimes.  Can there be greater evidence of the meaning of the Torah’s command?  Do not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor! 

I may never be able to understand how to love all human beings, but I can say that all human beings are my neighbors.  As we commemorate the Holocaust we must learn to say that all human beings are my neighbors.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Ahrei Mot-Passover Sermon

This sermon was written for Friday, April 15th.

Why is it that the holiday that celebrates the creation of the Jewish people appears today to give rise to far more divisions?  There is the Ashkenazi and Sephardi divide.  Do you eat rice on Passover?  Do you only cook with potatoes?  There are the Reform and Orthodox divisions.  Do you observe seven days or eight?  There are the endless discussions about kitniyot (legumes) and of course this year’s quinoa controversy.  Apparently rabbis have been dispatched to South America’s Andes to discern if there are wheat particles mixed in with the quinoa.  Personally I have been enjoying this gluten free grain for years.  I recommend the red variety in particular.  I recently read that there are even some who won’t eat meat, drink milk or eat eggs from animals that have been fed hametz.  (If you don’t believe me listen to Tablet Magazine’s Vox Tablet podcast “Against the Grain” here.)

You can really start losing sight of the import of this holiday in its details.  These “kosher battles” and the accusations of who is more religious can diminish the ideal that we are supposed to be promoting.  We are one people despite our many different ways of observing.  All must hold fast to the idea that we are remembering slavery and celebrating freedom.  These are the essential messages of the Passover holiday.  The rest is commentary, or if you prefer decorations.  The potential small pieces of wheat in a box of quinoa or the microscopic bits of hametz in milk are not the essence.  By the way the left is not entirely innocent.  There is a restaurant that I read about, also in Tablet Magazine, which goes out of its way to make its food traif.  It serves matzah balls wrapped in bacon. (Again you can read that article here.)  Yes we are free and can eat whatever we want, but need we flout Jewish history and memory as well?   Bacon donuts might be one thing, but matzah balls dripping with pork fat seem an entirely different matter.

In case these differences are not enough, in this week’s Torah portion we find another law that divides us.  Ahrei Mot contains Leviticus 18, a detailed list of prohibited sexual relations.  So controversial was this portion that it is no longer read in the vast majority of synagogues as Yom Kippur’s afternoon Torah reading.  In all Reform synagogues, and many Conservative, Leviticus 19’s holiness code is read instead.  In this week’s portion it relates: “Do not uncover the nakedness of your father’s wife…or your sister… or your son’s daughter…”  These are of course not the controversy, although many seem to feel that all of this talk of nakedness is not befitting Yom Kippur.  The controversy is not about bestiality or incest but found in one verse: “Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman; it is an abhorrence.” (Leviticus 18:22) 

This law is the biblical basis for the prohibition against homosexuality.  We should be careful to note that traditional Jewish law understands this to mean a prohibition against the homosexual act alone.  It is not a statement of feelings.  It is only about actions.  The Talmudic rabbis added a prohibition against lesbian sex.  Still the Jewish world remains terribly divided about this issue.  The Reform movement openly ordains gay and lesbian Jews as rabbis.  Some Reform rabbis officiate at commitment ceremonies.  Others do not.  The film, “Trembling before God,” explored the excruciating challenges of gays and lesbians living in an Orthodox world.   It is a wrenching film.  (You can watch the entire movie on Hulu.)  Years after first watching this film, I still find that it continues to have a profound effect on me.  I cannot forget the endless statements of abandonment and pain.  Parents shunned children.  Rabbis advised young people to remain celibate rather than transgress the Torah’s words.  Many expressed over and over again how they would choose another life if they could.  But their attractions could not be swayed, just like mine for a woman cannot be changed. “Why can’t I be both gay and Orthodox?” they asked.  “Why can’t the Torah’s words, like so many other verses, be reinterpreted?”

Rather than see these individuals, and couples, as human beings standing before us, Jewish leaders make rulings.  We rule and draw divisions.  “We accept you.”  And under our breath, we say, “We are therefore more compassionate.” Or we say, “We cannot accept your desires.”  And under our breath, we say, “We alone are the guardians of Torah true Judaism.”  We speak as if homosexuality is some theoretical issue about which we can agree or disagree.  But then lines are drawn across peoples’ lives.  We divide ourselves by our theories and interpretations, beliefs and ideologies.  We pretend that people are like bits and pieces of hametz.  And we therefore remain forever divided and fractured—and fellow Jews feel cast aside.  Can we still remain one people?  If we looked instead into the eyes of others perhaps we would be drawn together.

And that is what pains me the most during this year’s celebrations of Passover.  We are but 14 million people at best.  Rather than being drawn together we draw lines between us.  Why can’t we hear the command also in our Torah portion, v’chai bahem—live by them, as a command to our entire people?  We must live—together.  Instead we scream and yell at each other.  We believe that our way is the only way.  Only this week a Reform synagogue was vandalized in Tel Aviv.   Do we prefer violence and potentially even death to living together? 

It pains me that the holiday that made us one people today makes us even more divided.  But I will not let go of Ahavat Yisrael, love of the Jewish people.  We are one people.  Most people think that the Shema is only about proclaiming God’s oneness.  But it is also about declaring our people’s oneness.  Shema Yisrael is in the singular.  Hear O Israel is its opening words.  You can read this, as the tradition mostly does, as a statement made to each individual Jew who must hear this command affirming one God as directed to him or her.  I prefer instead to hear it addressed to the Jewish people when we stand as one.  God is only one when we are one.  When we stand as Am Echad, one people, then and only then is God one.

Only together can we proclaim God’s oneness.  We need each other.  We need less kosher for Passover products (although I really do like the jelly rings).  We need fewer divisions.  We need less looking over our shoulders at others, or looking down at others.  We need more standing together as one people.

On this Passover we need more unity and oneness.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Another Newsletter Article

And here is my article from the March-April 2011 Newsletter.
Continuing with the tradition begun in the last newsletter, here are some of our students’ “questions for the rabbi” along with my answers.

Were Adam and Eve the first people on earth?
According to the Torah Adam and Eve were the first people who were made by God. I think part of your question, however, is how come they teach me one thing in school and another thing in Religious School. How can science and evolution be true and religion and the Bible also be true? Evolution and science teach us how human beings came to be. Religion and Judaism teach us what the purpose of our life is. We don’t read the Bible as a science manual. Instead we read it to tell us what we are supposed to do with our lives. Only the Torah can tell us that God wanted to create human beings for the purpose of perfecting our world and bringing healing to the world.

Did any sport come from Hebrew?
The latest Jewish sport is Ga-Ga which is a friendlier and safer form of dodge ball and started in modern day Israel. But did you know that the entire roster of the first New York Knicks team was Jewish? Here is their lineup: Ossie Schectman, Stan Stutz, Jake Weber, Ralph Kaplowitz, and Leo "Ace" Gottlieb. The first points ever scored in the NBA were by the Knicks' point guard, Schectman. Take that Stoudemire! (Oops I forgot. He might be Jewish too.)

Can the fourth graders sing at services again?
Yes.

Is the Maccabees' temple still standing and is everything still in it?
No and no. But one of the really awesome things about visiting Israel is that you can touch parts of that ancient Temple.  The Western Wall contains some stones from that time. Recently they uncovered the steps that led up to the Temple. In Israel you can stand next to stones that are thousands of years old and touch our history while also enjoying everything that is modern, like a really great falafel or espresso (that’s Hebrew for strong coffee).

Are we going to get a temple?
Yes. And soon. But remember that a building is not the most important part of our congregation. Just like your house does not make your family, our building does not make our synagogue. It must always be first and foremost about the people.

Why can’t Jewish people swear?
Because it is really not nice to swear. It shows that you are angry and that kind of anger always gets you in trouble. But the most important thing about swearing is that you should never use God’s name in a curse or swear. God’s name should only be used in prayer, when saying thank you. God should lead you to do positive things.  Doing good things starts with positive words.

Since Jews can’t have tattoos, does that include washable ones?
No. You can get washable tattoos. The problem with tattoos is that they are permanent and we believe that our bodies are a reflection of God and you don’t mess with God’s image. We believe that you can’t do whatever you want even with your body. You have to take care of yourself and you should never do anything that might be dangerous to your body.

What is your favorite color?
Blue. But not Carolina blue. More like Duke blue which is close to the blue of an Israeli flag, which is supposed to be like the Bible’s techelet. So go (royal blue) Blue Devils!

Keep asking your questions. They are always the most important thing about being Jewish!
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Newsletter Article

I neglected to include my recent newsletter articles.  What follows is my article from our January-February 2011 Newsletter.
Recently Mrs. Bertash, our Religious School principal, began collecting questions for the rabbi. Our students could write down any question that was on their mind and that they wanted me to answer. What follows are a few of their questions and of course my answers.

How was God named?
In the Torah God is called by many names. God’s name is “Y-H-V-H.” But we no longer know how this name was pronounced so we say, Adonai, meaning my lord. There are many names for God in our tradition. I like to think that these many names offer us just as many different ways of approaching God.

How do you become Jewish?
If your parents tell you that you are Jewish then you are Jewish. But sometimes people choose to convert to Judaism because they think being Jewish is so awesome.

Why did you decide to become a Rabbi?
Because I like to talk. And listen. Mostly it is because I like learning and teaching and helping people.

How many times have your read the Torah?
Since I started rabbinical school when I was 22 years old, I have read the Torah once a year every year. So that is about 24 times.

Do you regret being a Rabbi?
No. How could I with these kind of questions and students like you? But if you mean is being a rabbi sometimes hard, then the answer is yes. Sometimes people ask me to stand by their side at really, really difficult times and that occasionally breaks my heart.

Is it considered a sin to be Jewish but not to believe in God?
No. But being Jewish is about trying. You always have to try to be a better person. You have to believe that the world can be better. Believing in God, or trying to believe in God, helps. So believing in God helps us become better people!

What is your favorite Jewish holiday?
Sukkot. I love building and decorating our sukkah and eating and sleeping outside.

What is the Kotel like?
Jerusalem and the Western Wall are awesome. It is wonderful to stand where so many Jews have stood and prayed. The stones are massive, but smooth because so many people touched them and kissed them.

How many letters are in the Torah?
304,805 letters and 79,847 words. I had to ask a scribe for the answer to this question because I am not so good at math.

How many cars long is the Torah?
It depends on what kind of car you are talking about. If it is an SUV then 5. A smart car then a minyan of 10. Mysteriously when we unroll the Torah scroll it fits almost perfectly around the inside of the church sanctuary.

Are Jewish people allowed to celebrate Halloween or Thanksgiving or New Years Eve?
Yes, but don’t have as much fun on these days as you do on Purim, Sukkot and Shabbat!

Is God real?
Yes. Sometimes I admit it does not feel that way, but I believe God is real.

Keep those questions coming!
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Passover Thoughts

Eighteen minutes.  That is the difference between matzah and bread.  From the moment the flour is mixed with water to the time this mixture is placed in the oven must be eighteen minutes or less.  If it is longer the mixture is deemed bread.  If less it is matzah. 

Our tradition recognizes that leavening is a naturally occurring process.  It happens any time flour is mixed with water.   And so it is a minute that demarcates the difference between leavened and unleavened bread.  One minute can make all the difference between kosher and not, between matzah and bread, between what is proper and what is not. 

According to the rabbis the leavening agent of yeast symbolizes the yetzer hara, the evil inclination.  The yetzer represents passion and drive, ambition and competition.  Too much of any of these and our lives become ruled by lust and greed.  Too little and we lack motivation.  We require the yetzer hara, never in abundance, but always in the right measure and within the proper framework.  With it in such measure, bounded by holiness, husbands and wives are pulled toward each other.  With it as well the desire to succeed pushes us to create and invent.

Too much yeast and bread becomes sour (and wine becomes spoiled).  And so the rabbis taught that the yetzer hara must be controlled and framed.  On Passover we liberate ourselves from the souring effect of the yetzer hara.  For one week we live without the effects of this leavening agent.

Eighteen minutes.  That is the difference between matzah and bread.  One minute is all the difference between kosher and not, right and wrong.  It is only a matter of minutes.  Nineteen minutes and the matzah is transformed into the ordinary bread of every week and every day.  Eighteen minutes and it remains the kosher bread for this holiday of Passover.

One minute, one word, one action that as well is the difference between right and wrong. It is always a fine line.  It is rarely if ever a matter of hours or days.  In a brief moment we must choose between right and wrong.  That minute is what defines our actions as kosher or not. 

And that is the spiritual lesson of the matzah we eat at this evening’s Seder.  It is never just about food!
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Passover Card

Your JCB family wishes you a happy and joyous Passover!


Rebbe Nachman of Bratslav said: Seek the sacred within the ordinary.  Seek the remarkable within the commonplace.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Ahrei Mot

The Talmud reports: “Except for the prohibitions against murder, incest and idolatry, any commandment must be set aside for pikuah nefesh, saving a human life.” (Sanhedrin 74a)

This week’s Torah portion concurs: “v’chai b’hem, you shall live by them” (Leviticus 18: 5)  The commandments are intended to be life affirming.  We are not to die because of them.  Only in extreme examples when faced, for example, with committing murder do we choose martyrdom, preferring death over life.

On Monday evening the holiday of Passover begins.  Passover is given to scrupulous observance.  We are commanded to rid our homes of hametz, leavened products, and eat only matzah and kosher for Passover foods for the holiday's eight days.  One encounters many different levels of observance within the rituals of Passover.  Unfortunately at this time of year one also hears statements that are disparaging of other Jews’ observance.  “That’s not kosher for Passover.  How could you eat corn syrup?  I keep Passover for eight days.” 

On the holiday that marks our freedom from Egypt and our beginnings as a people there should be room for all manners of observance.  Within Judaism there should be room for many different rituals and ways of marking our Jewish identities.

It saddens me that the holiday which celebrates our becoming a people has been transformed into one marked by disparate observances and a fractured community.  Why can’t we be one and enjoy this joyous holiday together?  On this Passover we should pledge to relearn how to better live together.  While the tradition understood the verse “you shall live by them” in individual terms I wish to hear this command as directed to the Jewish people. 

My question is: can we still live together—as one people?  The mitzvah of ahavat Yisrael, love of the Jewish people, is one that should help us to transcend our differences, to look away from our disparate styles and levels of observance, and see instead one people.  Love of the Jewish people is one of the guiding principles of my faith. 

I must love the Jewish people, despite our differences and disagreements.  I must love all the Jewish people.  We are not so numerous (14 million worldwide according to the most optimistic of counts) that we can afford to divide ourselves even further.  Why must we measure how much matzah or how little bread others eat?  Why must we number how many sets of dishes others have?  Why must we count how often others pray? 

Thousands of years ago, on that first Passover night, we became a Jewish people.  This year we must rekindle that oneness.  We must reaffirm our love of all Jews.  That is far more important than what we eat or don’t eat.  That is how the commandments will help us to live again. 

Rabbi Leo Baeck, a great 20th century German rabbi and survivor of the Holocaust, wrote:  "The Jew knows that the greatest commandment is to live."  I would add: “to live together.”
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Beware of Democracy?

This week's Wall Street Journal offers an excellent, if troubling, interview with Bernard Lewis, arguably one of the Western World's foremost experts on the Middle East.  Lewis argues against moving too quickly to elections in the Arab world.  While the protest movement is encouraging, he cautions:
Elections, he argues, should be the culmination—not the beginning—of a gradual political process. Thus "to lay the stress all the time on elections, parliamentary Western-style elections, is a dangerous delusion."
He advocates not the bringing about of a Western style democracy but a more open, tolerant society that incorporates Arab and Muslim traditions.

Bernard Lewis has been studying the Middle East for over sixty years.  We would do well to heed his words.  He offers a number of sobering observations:
First, Tunisia has real potential for democracy, largely because of the role of women there. "Tunisia, as far as I know, is the only Muslim country that has compulsory education for girls from the beginning right through. And in which women are to be found in all the professions," says Mr. Lewis.

"My own feeling is that the greatest defect of Islam and the main reason they fell behind the West is the treatment of women," he says. He makes the powerful point that repressive homes pave the way for repressive governments. "Think of a child that grows up in a Muslim household where the mother has no rights, where she is downtrodden and subservient. That's preparation for a life of despotism and subservience. It prepares the way for an authoritarian society," he says.

Egypt is a more complicated case, Mr. Lewis says. Already the young, liberal protesters who led the revolution in Tahrir Square are being pushed aside by the military-Muslim Brotherhood complex. Hasty elections, which could come as soon as September, might sweep the Muslim Brotherhood into power. That would be "a very dangerous situation," he warns. "We should have no illusions about the Muslim Brotherhood, who they are and what they want."

And yet Western commentators seem determined to harbor such illusions. Take their treatment of Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi. The highly popular, charismatic cleric has said that Hitler "managed to put [the Jews] in their place" and that the Holocaust "was divine punishment for them."

Yet following a sermon Sheikh Qaradawi delivered to more than a million in Cairo following Mubarak's ouster, New York Times reporter David D. Kirkpatrick wrote that the cleric "struck themes of democracy and pluralism, long hallmarks of his writing and preaching." Mr. Kirkpatrick added: "Scholars who have studied his work say Sheik Qaradawi has long argued that Islamic law supports the idea of a pluralistic, multiparty, civil democracy."
Professor Lewis has been here before. As the Iranian revolution was beginning in the late 1970s, the name of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was starting to appear in the Western press. "I was at Princeton and I must confess I never heard of Khomeini. Who had? So I did what one normally does in this world of mine: I went to the university library and looked up Khomeini and, sure enough, it was there."

'It" was a short book called "Islamic Government"—now known as Khomeini's Mein Kampf—available in Persian and Arabic. Mr. Lewis checked out both copies and began reading. "It became perfectly clear who he was and what his aims were. And that all of this talk at the time about [him] being a step forward and a move toward greater freedom was absolute nonsense," recalls Mr. Lewis.

"I tried to bring this to the attention of people here. The New York Times wouldn't touch it. They said 'We don't think this would interest our readers.'

And in other troubling news today's Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported:
The Palestinian Authority has just honored the terrorist mastermind responsible for the Passover Massacre, a terrorist atrocity which claimed the lives of 30 innocent Israeli citizens attending the Seder, the traditional Passover meal, at Netanya's Park Hotel on March 27, 2002.

The Palestinian Authority has chosen a bizarre and troubling way to mark the upcoming Jewish festival of Passover. Despite an often voiced Palestinian commitment to end the glorification of terrorists and incitement to violence, on March 28 Issa Karake, the Palestinian Authority Minister of Prisoners' Affairs, visited the family of Hamas suicide-bomb mastermind Abbas Al-Sayed, awarding them with an official, festive plaque, in celebration of the anniversary of the massacre.
Will democracy bring to power our enemies or friends?  I believe in democracy.  I am afraid however that I cannot always trust it.

Addendum: I failed to note that the author of this interview is Bari Weiss who is an assistant editorial features editor at the Journal.  Her thoughts and opinions are apparently interspersed throughout the interview.
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Metzora

Two weeks of leprosy!  This week’s Torah portion also discusses the details of leprosy, including a leprous plague occurring on the walls of a house.  Thankfully the rabbinic sages transformed metzora into a moral lesson.  They spun a midrash from the letters of this Hebrew word for leprosy, expanding metzora into motzi shem ra, the spreading of malicious gossip. 

They reasoned that gossip is morally disfiguring just as leprosy is physically deforming.  Their teachings on gossip continue to resonate today.  When we gossip, repeating something that is unflattering of others, we disfigure ourselves as well as others.  We must recognize that just as words can build worlds, so too can they destroy.  A person’s reputation can be destroyed with the press of a keyboard’s send.  We follow a tradition that is built on the power of words.  We can bless, as well as curse.  We can praise, as well destroy.  Once such negative words have been passed on to others, gathering them up can be an impossible task. 

There are far too many examples from which we can draw to illustrate this point.  This week for instance we read that Judge Goldstone retracted his most damaging claim against Israel.  In his United Nations report on the recent Gaza War he wrote that Israel and its soldiers had purposely targeted civilians.  Now he writes that his previous claim was false.   I always knew that such claims were false, but how can he now gather up these words and undo the damage they have caused to Israel’s image and prestige?   

Judaism counsels us that even if the story is true we should not repeat it.  When speaking of others we must be most cautious.  Our words can cause irreparable harm.  The Chofetz Chaim, and nineteenth century Mussar teacher, offers us nine guidelines for right speech.

1. Do no spread a negative image of someone, even if that image is true.
2. Do not share information that can cause physical, financial, emotional or spiritual harm.
3. Do not embarrass people, even in jest.
4. Do not pretend that writing or body language or innuendo is not speech.
5. Do not speak against a community, race, ethnic group, gender, or age group.
6. Do not gossip, even to your spouse, relatives, or close friends.
7. Do not repeat gossip, even when it is generally known.
8. Do not tell people negative things said about them, for this can lead to needless conflict.
9. Do not listen to gossip.  Give everyone the benefit of the doubt. (Rabbi Rami Shapiro, The Sacred Art of Lovingkindness)

Everyone is guilty of gossiping.  We often speak of others.  I admit, it can be fun and entertaining.  Recounting others’ problems makes us feel better about ourselves.  But in the end gossiping only lessens our stature.  So let us be more cautious when speaking about others.  We should strive to use our words only for healing.  Another Mussar teacher, Rabbi Israel Salanter, added: “Say what you mean.  And do what you say.”  That is an excellent motto by which to live our lives. 

In these ways the rabbis transformed metzora into timeless moral lessons about the power of words. The leprous infections on houses, however, the sages were unable to transform into a moral lesson.  Some even doubted that such an infection could exist.  They questioned its meaning.  And then Hurricane Katrina occurred and I realized the lesson.  Too many were given to declare the Torah’s words, “Something like a plague has appeared on my house.”  (Leviticus 14:35)  Even after the waters receded, the black line remained. 

And that is the moral lesson of gossip as well.  It forever stains us.

And by the way, for more on New Orleans’ black line, listen to the Blues guitarist, Spencer Bohren, sing his song, Long Black Line: “Beautiful New Orleans, oh, she was so fine.  Now everywhere you go, there's just the long black line.”
Read More
Rabbi Steven Moskowitz Rabbi Steven Moskowitz

Johnny Clegg

Ari and I enjoyed a great concert this week at City Winery with Johnny Clegg.  Here is his song "Cruel, Crazy, Beautiful World."



Check out his website for more of his music and songs.  By the way, 46664 was Nelson Mandela's prisoner number and now the name of the humanitarian organization that promotes HIV/AIDS awareness and prevention.
Read More